On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > >> This was already discussed: > >> > >> > http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDF1fRrJj08AvFARfCstkQfgg=RH85n-UPh3ZZ_fjc2wA@mail.gmail.com > > > > Can we describe in IDL that the interface DOMPoint inherits from the > > dictionary DOMPointLiteral? > > It seems that there are some subtle differences between attributes and > > dictionary member that is otherwise lost. > > There's no need to do any of this. It's very simple and easy. A > DOMPoint satisfies the definition of a DOMPointLiteral - it's an > object with the necessary named attributes. As long as we're not > trying to do anything fancy just with "real" DOMPoints (which we > aren't, and shouldn't), then just having the methods take a > DOMPointLiteral is all we need to do. > OK. As long as we remember that going forward, this should be fine. > > A dictionary isn't a real "thing". It's just a description of a > "shape" that objects have to have. >Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 20:33:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC