- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 18:22:34 +0100 (IST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Found a few more things... On Sun, September 22, 2013 5:41 pm, Tony Graham wrote: > Status of this document > > This section advises "[css3-break]", whereas "Feedback:" advises > "[css-break]". They were, however, consistent in advising "[css3-break]" > in http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-break-20120228/. > > > Section 1.2, "Values" > > Does the double square brackets in "[[CSS3VALUE]]" denote anything? > > > Section 4, "Rules for Breaking" > > In the first paragraph, there's a comma after "forced breaks" but not > after "unforced breaks" in the following, parallel sentence. > > > Section 4.3, "Forced breaks" > > "they combine such all types of break are honored" should be "they combine > such that all types of breaks are honored". > > Also, either "Forced breaks" should be "Forced Breaks" to match the > capitalisation of the other titles in the document or the other titles > should be changed to be more consistent with other CSS specs. > > > Section 5.1, "Breaking into Varying-size Fragmentainers" > > "continuos" should be "continuous". > > "accross" should be "across". > > "remining" should be "remaining". > > Presumably "CSS 2.1 9.5" should be linked in the manner of "[CSS21] > section 13.3" in section 1.1. > > In EXAMPLE 2, "a first page of 400px" probably should be "a first page > height of 400px" to make it explicit that you're talking about heights. > > Similarly, uses of "size" in the EXAMPLE 2 bullet points should be > "height". or "page height". In the fourth bullet point, the remaining progress percentage has gone from 58.16% to 48.16% Also, 246.9px is 41.84%, not 58.16% nor 48.16%, of 590px > Section 5.4, "Transforms, Positioning, and Pagination" > > "a containing block fragment" initially reads as a noun (especially since > there's "a transformed fragment" in the previous paragraph). Perhaps it > could be "a containing block will fragment"? > > Similarly with "box's content fragments" in the third paragraph, but I > have no fix-up to suggest. > > Regards, > > > Tony Graham tgraham@mentea.net > Consultant http://www.mentea.net > Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland > > > >
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2013 17:24:29 UTC