- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 17:41:57 +0100 (IST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Status of this document This section advises "[css3-break]", whereas "Feedback:" advises "[css-break]". They were, however, consistent in advising "[css3-break]" in http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-break-20120228/. Section 1.2, "Values" Does the double square brackets in "[[CSS3VALUE]]" denote anything? Section 4, "Rules for Breaking" In the first paragraph, there's a comma after "forced breaks" but not after "unforced breaks" in the following, parallel sentence. Section 4.3, "Forced breaks" "they combine such all types of break are honored" should be "they combine such that all types of breaks are honored". Also, either "Forced breaks" should be "Forced Breaks" to match the capitalisation of the other titles in the document or the other titles should be changed to be more consistent with other CSS specs. Section 5.1, "Breaking into Varying-size Fragmentainers" "continuos" should be "continuous". "accross" should be "across". "remining" should be "remaining". Presumably "CSS 2.1 9.5" should be linked in the manner of "[CSS21] section 13.3" in section 1.1. In EXAMPLE 2, "a first page of 400px" probably should be "a first page height of 400px" to make it explicit that you're talking about heights. Similarly, uses of "size" in the EXAMPLE 2 bullet points should be "height". Section 5.4, "Transforms, Positioning, and Pagination" "a containing block fragment" initially reads as a noun (especially since there's "a transformed fragment" in the previous paragraph). Perhaps it could be "a containing block will fragment"? Similarly with "box's content fragments" in the third paragraph, but I have no fix-up to suggest. Regards, Tony Graham tgraham@mentea.net Consultant http://www.mentea.net Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2013 16:42:19 UTC