- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:50:37 +0300
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > Is the spec in CR or progressed even further? Then yes, otherwise no. See csswg.org for guidance or one of the multiple threads on this mailing list to this topic. What happened to http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2012/08/30/resolutions-53/ ? Looks like csswg.org is out of date on this point. As for WebKit policy, with Blink (http://www.chromium.org/blink#vendor-prefixes) and Gecko (https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Overholt/APIExposurePolicy) moving away from vendor prefixes (to keeping experimental features in experimental builds) and WebKit no longer enjoying Chrome's market share, hasn't -webkit- prefixing now turned from an advantage to a liability for WebKit? Why stick to that badness still? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 08:51:04 UTC