W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [CSSOM] Revisiting transforms and getBoundingClientRect()

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:59:24 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLac31L6oqnnE7tNwApt5GhjGmCXnfX3U1P4sB4YA8mJwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Andrew Dupont <w3@andrewdupont.net>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

> Well, ClientRect has a specific boundary to an object in the first place,
> while other geometry terms like Matrix, Point, Quad don't need to have
> this. It looks strange to me to prefix the latter terms with Client.
>

Yeah, I don't really want to go that way.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 11:59:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC