W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: DOMPoint dictionary problem

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:07:26 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZBDEu0wVMWoMrbG3bbqH0xeEyYgQ+JJYPqY2BWZ7-_AA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Jet Villegas W3C <w3c@junglecode.net>, Cameron McCormack <heycam@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mozilla.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

> I still think it would be useful to resolve decisions on DOMPoint together
> with a view to the needs of DOMMatrix which uses a Point definition as
> well. The current definition of Point in DOMMatrix is a dictionary and
> should have been compatible with DOMPoint dictionary. It is my
> understanding that this does not need to be the case with an interface
> DOMPoint. Difference: DOMPoint just has the attributes 'x' and 'y'. Point
> in DOMMatrix has at least a third parameter 'z' and possibly a forth 'w'
> (needs a resolution).
>

We can just add 'z' and 'w' attributes to DOMPoint.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 09:07:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC