- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:32:54 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/28/2013 06:08 PM, John Daggett wrote: > > Koji Ishii wrote: > >> During the discussion, fantasai made a new edit. How good does this look to you all? >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes/#text-combine-horizontal >> >> # The UA must ensure that the combined advance width of the composition >> # fits within 1em by compressing the combined text if necessary. (This >> # does not necessarily mean that the glyphs will fit within 1em, as some >> # glyphs are designed to draw outside their geometric boundaries.) >> # OpenType implementations must use width-specific variants (hwid/twid/qwid) >> # to compress text in cases where those variants are available for all >> # characters in the composition. Otherwise, the UA may use any means to >> # compress the text, including substituting half-width, third-width, >> # and/or quarter-width glyphs provided by the font, using other font >> # features designed to compress text horizontally, scaling the text >> # geometrically, or any combination thereof. >> >> I think this edit is great and satisfies all requirements came up in >> the discussion so far. >> >> If we all are fine with this text, we can close this issue. > > I'm fine with this edit. The one minor piece remaining is the fixup > or removal of Example 20, as I noted to fantasai privately, since the > example is incompatible with the wording above. I'm looking over Example 20, and I don't see how it's inconsistent with the prose quoted above. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2013 11:33:26 UTC