- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:05:29 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/11/2013 03:01 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 05/21/2013 07:58 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: >> The flexbox spec currently says: >> >> # The following features are at-risk: >> # * Calculation of the static position of >> # absolutely-positioned flex items. >> >> This is in both the TR and the ED versions: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#status >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#status >> >> I think the static-position chunk of spec has remained the same for a >> while now -- is it still considered to be "at-risk"? > > The WG discussed this today in the context of Grid Layout and > what we want to do there, and decided it would be best to > simplify the static position to be as if the element did > participate in flex layout, but were the sole flex item in > a fixed-size flex container of the resulting size of the > flex container after layout. > > [Hopefully the spec ends up a bit more readable than that > insanely long sentence.] P.S. Let me know if that makes sense. :) ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 22:05:57 UTC