- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:28:26 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:46 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transitions/ and > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-animations/ list some of the properties > as applying to "Media: visual" and some as applying to "Media: > interactive". It's not clear to me which is better, or, frankly, if > either is correct. > > Visual seems clearly wrong since per [1], it includes things like > print (on paper). > > But interactive also seems wrong since: > * it includes things like speech, where it's not at all clear to me > how a dynamic change of an aural property could be handled, since > the entire medium depends on presenting the document over time > rather than all at once > > * it doesn't seem, based on the definition in [1], to include > things such as a screen on which javascript can run and change > things but the user can interact > > Thoughts on what this should say? If what I said in [1] holds, it should say "visual, interactive"? That's what's used for cursor in CSS2.1, for instance. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0741.html -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 19:28:54 UTC