- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:46:58 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20130910124658.GA26552@crum.dbaron.org>
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transitions/ and http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-animations/ list some of the properties as applying to "Media: visual" and some as applying to "Media: interactive". It's not clear to me which is better, or, frankly, if either is correct. Visual seems clearly wrong since per [1], it includes things like print (on paper). But interactive also seems wrong since: * it includes things like speech, where it's not at all clear to me how a dynamic change of an aural property could be handled, since the entire medium depends on presenting the document over time rather than all at once * it doesn't seem, based on the definition in [1], to include things such as a screen on which javascript can run and change things but the user can interact Thoughts on what this should say? -David [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/media.html#media-groups -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 12:47:28 UTC