- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 01:03:43 -0700
- To: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:52 PM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2013, at 12:23, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >> With the CSS filter() image function I see a lot of the use cases already addressed. You can filter background-image, border-image-source, mask-image, mask-image-source, list-item-image and apply the filter property on the content itself. There are still things you can not do with the filter property nor with the filter() function, but I didn't hear any request from authors so far. >> >> I would be in favor for removing this issue or (if people feel strongly about it) at least delay it to the next level of the spec. >> >> Any opinions? > > Are there any actual use cases that filter() doesn’t cover? filter() can just filter CSS Images. You can not filter border: solid black 1px; for example. > > Although it might be worth it to design a generic mechanism for styling backgrounds, borders etc separately. Many of the FXTF specs need this: Blending modes, Compositing, filters, masking etc. If this is exposed, it’s seems unwise to approach every case separately. Perhaps we could do it by adding a bunch of pseudo-elements? But then it gets complicated to define which properties are available there… I agree. If we want to have special mechanism like "filter the border" or "filter just the content" with a property on the element itself, we should have global, property independent mechanism to define which paint phase should be affected. This is quite a challenge especially with blending where you may want to blend different paint phases with each other. But solvable. Greetings, Dirk > > ~Lea
Received on Saturday, 7 September 2013 08:04:12 UTC