- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 12:31:32 +1200
- To: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 7 September 2013 00:31:59 UTC
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote: > You wrote: > > > "CSS pixels at 100% zoom" doesn't seem all that useful to me. The page > > can't size anything in those units. All it can work with is CSS pixels > > with the current zoom. > > Authors should size things without regard to whether or not the user has > zoomed. Making something smaller when the user has explicitly zoomed in > on it is really user-hostile. > I agree very strongly! That's why I want all exposed Web APIs to use lengths in CSS pixels that are affected by the page's zoom factor, none of this "CSS pixels at 100% zoom" stuff :-). Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Saturday, 7 September 2013 00:31:59 UTC