- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:13:28 +0200
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Hello John, Wednesday, October 16, 2013, 2:28:46 AM, you wrote: >> 3. Writing Modes TR Codepoints Followup >> --------------------------------------- >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0501.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0826.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0366.html > We still need input from other groups (I18N) and I think we need a > clarification from the Unicode UTC as to the intended scope of > UTR50, since Koji asserts that UTR50 implies that Tr fallback to a > rotated default glyph is a requirement of UTR50 "compliance". Certainly, getting input from UTC on the intended scope of UTR50 would be helpful. Although that would be better in advance of a f2f. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 13:13:39 UTC