W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-shapes] Functional Notation

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:19:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDdFtx14fsV7-xwvGKChM6u+QoP8jziq+rvURfMJ+k_sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> I don't understand why we'd go with commas for the color functions but not
> with commas for circle(), for example. It looks like needless consistency
> (or inconsistency, depending on what you're comparing to).

The color functions are legacy, and horrible for several reasons (like
using additional functions rather than optional arguments).  They're
not useful to cite for precedent.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 21:20:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:02 UTC