- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 09:36:46 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi TJ, I like your new approach for defining an+b, but I think that the grammar is missing a few clauses for when A is implicitly 1: n+3 +n+3 -n+3 Cheers, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Saturday, 11 May 2013 08:37:11 UTC