- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 08:37:30 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "lazaris@impressivewebs.com" <lazaris@impressivewebs.com>
On May 10, 2013, at 6:23 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 05/07/2013 11:38 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: >> Forwarding with Louis’s permission; thank you Louis for the feedback. >> >> *From:*Louis Lazaris [mailto:lazaris@impressivewebs.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 02, 2013 9:43 PM >> *To:* Ishii, Koji a | Koji | BLD >> *Subject:* Text shadows spec correction >> >> Hi, I've tried to send this to the W3C mailing list, but it didn't seem to go through: >> >> Regarding this section on text shadows: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-shadow-property >> >> It says: >> >> "Values are interpreted as for 'box-shadow' [CSS3BG]. (But note that spread values are not allowed.)" >> >> The box-shadow section of the spec that this links to explains that the box-shadow property also accepts an optional "inset" >> keyword. This keyword is not allowed for the text-shadow property, so the note in the parentheses should be updated to say: >> >> "(But note that spread values and the inset keyword are not allowed.)" > > Fixed! Thanks~ I hope we can get both those features in the next level of the spec, as they are very valuable for text shadow (especially spread).
Received on Saturday, 11 May 2013 15:38:02 UTC