Re: [css-syntax] <an+b> grammar

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
> Hi TJ,
>
> I like your new approach for defining an+b, but I think that the grammar is missing a few clauses for when A is implicitly 1:
>
> n+3
> +n+3
> -n+3

Should be fixed now.  I had to add 8 more clauses to the production,
but they group naturally with the existing ones, so it should still be
easy enough to understand.

~TJ