- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:45:10 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/29/13 1:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > It should be something like "If box-sizing is 'content-box', use the > 2.1 formula. If it's 'padding-box', use 'margin-left' + > 'border-left-width' + 'width' + 'border-right-width' + 'margin-right'. > If it's 'border-box', etc." + language about how to determine the size > of the content box given the various values. I see. That _really_ needs to be specced somewhere, if so. But it's not actually clear to me why this is a better formulation than having used width actually mean content-box width, honestly. Why is it better? > Don't trust Box for anything worthwhile. Well, do we have a spec that actually defines block layout anymore? ;) -Boris
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 17:45:40 UTC