- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:32:54 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 3/29/13 1:03 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Oh, no, not at all. You still want to return the used value *of the >> 'width' property*. 'box-sizing' changes how the 'width' property is >> interpreted when figuring out the width of the content box, but it >> doesn't actually change the value of the 'width' property itself. > > Uh... it can't possibly work that way, because the used width participates > in this equation in CSS2.1 section 10.3.3: > > 'margin-left' + 'border-left-width' + 'padding-left' + 'width' + > 'padding-right' + 'border-right-width' + 'margin-right' = width of > containing block Sure, and 2.1 preceded the 'box-sizing' property. (I'm completely unsurprised that 'box-sizing' doesn't properly specify its affect on computations like this, though.) It should be something like "If box-sizing is 'content-box', use the 2.1 formula. If it's 'padding-box', use 'margin-left' + 'border-left-width' + 'width' + 'border-right-width' + 'margin-right'. If it's 'border-box', etc." + language about how to determine the size of the content box given the various values. > or in this one in CSS3 Box draft section 15.3 if you prefer: > > start margin + start border + start padding + inline dimension + end > padding + end border + end margin = inline dimension of containing block Don't trust Box for anything worthwhile. > So the used "inline dimension" or "width", depending on which of those specs > you read, is 100% definitely affected by box-sizing. I think it's just an old spec and a spec bug (/old spec), and shouldn't be taken as indicative of anything. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 17:33:40 UTC