- From: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:55:47 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>
I have one concern for the naming of ':root'. I am afraid that It might be misleading that ':root' matches 'top-level elements in the distributed set' rather than 'insertion point' itself. There are multiple such roots. That's not intuitive for me. ':root' is likely to imply 'insertion point' itself because it's *root* of such elements. So instead of reusing ':root' in this context, how about having a more intuitive name, like ':child-of-shadow-host' or something? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> Whoops, Hayato-san pointed out something I didn't realize. >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: >>> It seems that we need a way to refer to the insertion point itself in >>> the selector. Tab suggested using ":root": >>> >>> ::distributed(:root>*) >> >> I didn't mean to suggest this. My suggestion was that :root match all >> the top-level elements in the distributed set, so if you wanted to >> select only the elements that were distributed, but not their >> descendants, you'd write ::distributed(:root) and be done. > > Thank you for the explanation! That makes sense. I don't have any > objections to that. > > > > -- > Hayato -- Hayato
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 03:56:36 UTC