- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:47:18 -0700
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sunday 2013-03-24 13:02 -0700, Rik Cabanier wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:14 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-background/#border-corner-shape appears > > to me to be an example of a feature that's addressing a problem that > > we don't have -- or at least that we don't have enough to be worth > > adding such a feature. I think it should be removed. > > > > In particular, if there were demand for the bevel | curve | notch > > values, we'd be seeing authors using the equivalents of such values > > on significant numbers of Web sites. So before agreeing to accept > > this new feature, I'd like to see examples of Web sites that are > > doing what these values would do. Not something similar to what > > these values would do, but exactly what these values would do, or at > > least close enough that the author wouldn't care about the > > difference. > > > > yes. > If this use case is important, it seems pretty limited in what it > accomplishes. Why not have a generic and easy way to do borders and sides > (defined in SVG?) that could to the same? We already have one in css3-background: the 'border-image' property. (And, as I said in my earlier message, it seems sufficient to me for these cases given my perception of demand for them.) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 20:47:45 UTC