- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:02:05 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 20:02:35 UTC
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:14 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-background/#border-corner-shape appears > to me to be an example of a feature that's addressing a problem that > we don't have -- or at least that we don't have enough to be worth > adding such a feature. I think it should be removed. > > In particular, if there were demand for the bevel | curve | notch > values, we'd be seeing authors using the equivalents of such values > on significant numbers of Web sites. So before agreeing to accept > this new feature, I'd like to see examples of Web sites that are > doing what these values would do. Not something similar to what > these values would do, but exactly what these values would do, or at > least close enough that the author wouldn't care about the > difference. > yes. If this use case is important, it seems pretty limited in what it accomplishes. Why not have a generic and easy way to do borders and sides (defined in SVG?) that could to the same?
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 20:02:35 UTC