W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: URI tokenization and tabs

From: Mike Samuel <mikesamuel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:35:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CACod6GtXJ6jqRThh69JVOyJ24t0NT5ZjXdBL+6t0mfGk15SMJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
2013/3/22 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>

> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Mike Samuel <mikesamuel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > CSS3's tokenization seems different from CSS2.1 in one regard that has
> me puzzled, and browsers seem to implement CSS2.1's version.
> You are looking at a *very* obsolete version of the spec.  Please view
> the editor's draft instead, at <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-syntax>,
> which has been 100% rewritten.
> Apologies for the TR version still being that 10-year old version.  I
> am very close to getting the ED sufficient to be officially put up
> there; in the meantime, CSS 2.1 is the official definition of the
> language's syntax.

Thanks.  Awesome.
Now the url-unquoted only means that the URI is not a FUNCTION with respect
to "/*" between the parentheses.

Is there an easy way to determine which w3 documents are relevant similar
to the "Obsoletes" in RFCs?

Btw, your name comes up way too often when searching the list archives for
anything "tab" related.

Received on Saturday, 23 March 2013 01:35:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:27 UTC