- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:54:30 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Issue 1: Numerical indices for grid-end / grid-after. Should they count starting from the first or last line? See thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0182.html Tab and I think they should start from the first line, so that numbers are always referring to a consistent line. Issue 2: Negative indices for grid positioning Should they be valid and count from the opposite side of positive indices? See thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0184.html Tab and I think this makes sense, especially if grid-end/after count from the start/before edge. Issue 3: Need better syntax for named lines. Should we adopt the parenthesized idents syntax? Other ideas? See thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0256.html Issue 4: The 'order' property Does 'order' apply to grid items? It would affect auto-placement and z-order, as for flex items. Tab and I think it should, for consistency with Flexbox. Issue 5: Grid Terminology Should we switch the term "grid area" to "grid field" and/or "grid cell" to "grid unit"? See thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0063.html No strong opinion, would be glad to hear from others. ~fantasai and TJ
Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 01:54:59 UTC