- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:22:56 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:41 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 03/12/2013 03:28 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: >> I'm fine with this under the assumption that all the justify/align >> keywords right now do "true" alignment. That does mean that >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-align/ has things backwards though. Instead >> of a "true" keyword to make things overflow the head >> edge of the container, we need a "safe" keyword to make things not >> overflow the head edge. >> >> I'm not sure "safe" is the best word for it though. Really this is just >> about the overflow being scrollable. >> So..."scrollable-overflow"? That's a bit verbose and obscure...but maybe >> it's better than "safe". > > Yeah, css3-align needs an update to align (ahem) with Flexbox. > > I've also been toying with the idea of, instead of true/safe, > just allowing two values for align: > the first is used in general, > the second when there's overflow. Yeah, I've thought about that too. Unsure whether it's worth the complexity, though. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 02:23:48 UTC