- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:41:06 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/12/2013 03:28 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: > I'm fine with this under the assumption that all the justify/align keywords right now do "true" alignment. That does mean that > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-align/ has things backwards though. Instead of a "true" keyword to make things overflow the head > edge of the container, we need a "safe" keyword to make things not overflow the head edge. > > I'm not sure "safe" is the best word for it though. Really this is just about the overflow being scrollable. > So..."scrollable-overflow"? That's a bit verbose and obscure...but maybe it's better than "safe". Yeah, css3-align needs an update to align (ahem) with Flexbox. I've also been toying with the idea of, instead of true/safe, just allowing two values for align: the first is used in general, the second when there's overflow. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 23:41:37 UTC