- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:33:02 -0500
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 11:33:29 UTC
> > Hi Sebastian, > The CSSWG reviewed your issue [1], and we don't believe that > text-underline-position > blocks enhancements to arbitrary text decorations. If arbitrary text > decorations > are added, they will simply ignore text-underline-position. > I read the minutes before, thanks. I still believe that arbitrary decoration definitions would make this property obsolete. > This particular switch is important for internationalization, so we > believe it is > necessary to keep in the spec, and since it does not block future > enhancements, > we don't see a reason to remove it. > I didn't say that something like this is not needed. I know that it's important for vertical writing modes. Though especially for these the property name seems misleading and misused. Sebastian
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 11:33:29 UTC