W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Comments on CSS3 Text Decoration

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:27:16 -0800
Message-ID: <5136FDE4.9070308@inkedblade.net>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
On 02/04/2013 06:15 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 02/02/2013 12:29 PM, fantasai wrote:
>> On 02/01/2013 01:10 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
>>> These comments are tracked: https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/36
>>> [I18N-ISSUE-248]
>>> 2.5 "text-decoration-skip": the value "spaces" is defined as:
>>> --
>>> Skip white space: this includes regular spaces (U+0020) and tabs (U+0009), as well as nbsp (U+00A0), ideographic space
>>> (U+3000), all fixed width spaces (such as U+2000–U+200A, U+202F and U+205F), and any adjacent letter-spacing or word-spacing.
>>> --
>> I noticed your original comments to the i18nwg also included
>>    " - this is an incomplete looking definition. Define to include all whitespace?"
>> So I also made the change to include all of Unicode general category Z.
>> I'm not sure if this is correct for the Ogham Space Mark U+1680, but
>> it's probably ok. Unsure about the Mongolian Vowel Separator, but I'm
>> following up by asking Martin Heijdra about that...
> OK, I've reverted this, because unlike the other characters in Z, the
> Mongolian Vowel Separator is not a word-separating character, so should
> probably stay underlined.
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Feb/0006.html

And apparently the UTC is fixing that by removing the Mongolian Vowel
Separator from Zs, so, back to Z.

Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 08:27:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:27 UTC