- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:40:48 +0100
- To: Andrei Bucur <abucur@adobe.com>
- CC: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 01/03/2013 00:11, Andrei Bucur a écrit : > I also think it should be noted a propagated forced break does not > apply if an unforced break already consumed the oportunity. For > example, if there's an unforced break between the last child (that > has break-after: always) of an element and the bottom border of it's > containing element (e.g. the height of the container is taller than > the fragmentainer) we stop propagating the break from the child to > the parent beacuse the break occured naturally with the layout. I’m not certain of all the corner cases, but I would have thought the opposite: ignored unforced breaks if there is a forced break. This is because we have many types of forced breaks. For example `break-after: right` can generate an empty page in order to continue on a right page. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 07:41:37 UTC