- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:35:00 +0100
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 28/02/2013 23:34, Alan Stearns a écrit : > Section 4.1 notes that: > > --- > Since breaks are only allowed between siblings (1), > not between a box and its container, > a Œbreak-before¹ value on a first-child box > is propagated to its container. > Likewise a Œbreak-after¹ value on a last-child box > is propagated to its container. > --- > > First, the (1) isn't clear to me - I'm assuming it refers to the mention > of 'siblings' in the Class 1 definition above. I suggest changing the text to: "Since <a href=#btw-blocks>Class 1 breaks</a> are only allowed between siblings, […]" > Second, I think there should be one more sentence that notes that this > propagation stops at the fragmented flow boundary. Is the flow / flow boundary terminology that of css3-regions? (I need to read up on that.) > If the first child of a > multicol element has break-before the break does not propagate to the > column or the multicol element. I suppose it depends on the type of break. A forced page break *should* propagate. > And if you have discontiguous elements > collected in a named flow, a break should not propagate to a container > outside of the named flow. Perhaps that's covered by the box/container > terminology, but in that case the break should never propagate to a region > box, either. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 07:41:34 UTC