- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 12:16:05 -0400
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: Felipe Nascimento de Moura <felipenmoura@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, brice@websailors.fr
On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 09:12 +0100, Simon Sapin wrote: [...] > > background-image: image(postponed "foo.png"); > > I think we’d only want the last one. First, redundant features that do > exactly the same thing should be avoided. > > But more importantly it’s not just background images: CSS as more and > more places where images are used: list-style-image, border-image, > content, … We don’t want to define additional properties or syntax for > each of them. Adding stuff in image() has the advantage of being > self-contained. I wonder if an alternative would be an on-demand( <url> ) function that could go anywhere that url() can go today? Then it could work for sounds, or other resources. -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Saturday, 29 June 2013 16:16:10 UTC