W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: text-overflow:ellipsis and text-overflow:<string> need to truncate bidi text logically

From: Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <aharon@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:28:55 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+FsOYZxHUDMuaHD3kZ9+b60E9290eAW8kLuOx_8uJbJuFfC9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Matitiahu Allouche <matitiahu.allouche@gmail.com>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, "public-i18n-bidi@w3.org" <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
*If* the spec is going to be changed to do logical truncation for
non-scrollable elements (which is my primary goal), and *if* logical
truncation is going to be specified to put the ellipsis where the first
truncated character would have gone (which is not my primary goal), then I
think that it would only make sense (and would be easier to implement) to
give it the same style as that first truncated character, for which it is
serving as a stand-in. At least it should be considered. But I am really
not adamant about it.

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <
> aharon@google.com> wrote:
>> I know, but the spec also seems to say to use visual truncation. In for a
>> dime, in for a dollar :-)
> If you want that changed, then you should explain why.
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
> waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
> *
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 15:29:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:31 UTC