Re: text-overflow:ellipsis and text-overflow:<string> need to truncate bidi text logically

*If* the spec is going to be changed to do logical truncation for
non-scrollable elements (which is my primary goal), and *if* logical
truncation is going to be specified to put the ellipsis where the first
truncated character would have gone (which is not my primary goal), then I
think that it would only make sense (and would be easier to implement) to
give it the same style as that first truncated character, for which it is
serving as a stand-in. At least it should be considered. But I am really
not adamant about it.


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <
> aharon@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I know, but the spec also seems to say to use visual truncation. In for a
>> dime, in for a dollar :-)
>>
>
> If you want that changed, then you should explain why.
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
> waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
> *
>