- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:46:32 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jun 26, 2013, at 11:03 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 06/26/2013 09:56 AM, Alan Stearns wrote: >> On 5/10/13 7:17 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> >>> Part I: letter-spacing: <length> allows justification >>> >>> Part II: Add 'fixed' keyword to disallow justification >>> >>> letter-spacing: normal | <length> || fixed >> >> I am fine with this proposal, but I think we should take both parts I and II. > > That works for me, if the rest of the WG agrees. :) I do. >> And we should mention that setting letter-spacing defines a minimum >> letter spacing and justification can only increase the spacing. > > I'm concerned a bit about this, as Japanese justification rules, > at least, tend to prefer compression to expansion. Would that be addressed by using negative letter spacing or just less letter spacing than with Latin letters? It would still be a minimum of how much compression was allowed, and would make it less likely to include gaps of too much space.
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 19:47:02 UTC