- From: Anselm Hannemann <info@anselm-hannemann.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:40:44 +0200
- To: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 21.06.2013, at 01:58, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 2013-05-22 11:24 +0200, Morten Stenshorne wrote: >> I'm considering implementing object-fit [1] and object-position [2] in >> Blink, and would like to hear other vendors' opinions on supporting >> these properties, most importantly to figure out if anyone is negative, >> but also to learn about any plans to implement them. As far as I know, >> these properties are currently only supported in Presto, where it's -o- >> prefixed, and it's also using an older version (working draft or even >> editor's draft - not sure) of the spec. The spec has reached CR by now, >> though. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#the-object-fit >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/#the-object-position > > The properties seem fine to me. I don't think they're a priority to > implement in the near future, but I think we (Mozilla) will probably > do so eventually. David, may I ask why you consider this feature (object-fit) as not very important? For Responsive Designs this is a pretty essential feature which could replace lots of JavaScript workarounds. I personally hope this to be implemented soon in all major browsers. -Anselm Hannemann @helloanselm
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 11:41:09 UTC