W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css3-ui] objections to nav-* properties

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:20:37 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dLaZARHGZsnB8kJMq2ZpDL2fXejiFd0cXazencQwrY9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> For anybody who reads this in the archives, I'll note that nav-index is
> >> already resolved to go away from level 3.
> >
> > I believe that earlier decision (to move to level 4) was reversed in [1]:
> >
> > "RESOLVED: leave directional nav-* properties at risk in level 3"
>
> nav-index is not directional. :) That resolution retains nav-up,
> nav-down, nav-left, nav-right in level 3, nav-index is still
> postponed.
>
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0090.html


Thanks for clarifying. Do we have information on implementation status for
nav-index? I know it was specified as required in ARIB B-24 starting in
1999.
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 17:21:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC