- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:40:15 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/18/2013 06:56 PM, Andrew Cunningham wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> clig could indeed be a problem, if it's needed across grapheme clusters. >> >> Are there situations where such ligatures occur across grapheme clusters? >> The spec forbids spacing within a grapheme cluster. > > Default grapheme cluster or tailored grapheme cluster? > > Since the two can be quite different, and can emping on users expectations. Technically, the spec allows tailoring, but uses extended grapheme cluster as the base requirement: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text/#grapheme-cluster I doubt the UA would tailor, for typographic purposes, to include *less* than an extended grapheme cluster. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 22:40:43 UTC