- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:17:34 +0200
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 July 2013 19:17:59 UTC
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:51:07 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > A grave problem with #4 is that "-webkit-mask: url(...)" would not work > if you just unprefix it blindly. That certainly is annoying, but it shouldn't be blocking us. Being able to make these changes is what we had prefixes for in the first place. Now, I agree that they are only moderately effective for that goal, so we should exercise some degree of care, but while I am comfortable rejecting trivial change in the name of compatibility with prefixed implementations I don't think we should let this prevent us from doing the right thing when there is a clear difference, and I believe there
Received on Monday, 15 July 2013 19:17:59 UTC