- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:51:33 +0200
- To: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
>> They should be invalid syntax, yes. >> >> ~TJ > > The rationale against what I suggested being…? > That people will probably be even more confused to get selectors in their OM that actually do not work. Do not forget that if the selector show up in the CSSOM, you've no way to tell if it works or not except by looking at the results. You could not even use qSA to test support since qSA would support it. It seems already weird enough that there could be a difference between qSA and normal CSS, let's try not to add ghost selectors to the mix.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 06:52:00 UTC