- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:06:42 +0100
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, Jon Rimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Le 01/07/2013 20:02, Brian Kardell a écrit : > We might considet exposing a non-lossy simple OM (not CSSOM, something > that could be parsed with JSON.parse) - I think that would be almost as > good. CSS's forward compat grammar is really good and anything that > would change it maybe should be very managed. I proposed this in 2011 i > think... Do you mean the Core Grammar defined in 2.1? http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#tokenization Syntax 3’s "component values" are a cleaned-up definition of the same thing. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#component-value -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 19:06:59 UTC