Le 01/07/2013 20:02, Brian Kardell a écrit : > We might considet exposing a non-lossy simple OM (not CSSOM, something > that could be parsed with JSON.parse) - I think that would be almost as > good. CSS's forward compat grammar is really good and anything that > would change it maybe should be very managed. I proposed this in 2011 i > think... Do you mean the Core Grammar defined in 2.1? http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#tokenization Syntax 3’s "component values" are a cleaned-up definition of the same thing. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#component-value -- Simon SapinReceived on Monday, 1 July 2013 19:06:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:31 UTC