- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:46:43 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Le 30/01/2013 01:42, Linss, Peter a écrit : >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0530.html > > The core grammar is a bit more restrictive than, IMO, it need to be. Syntax > 3 a bit less. But since these construct are invalid in any existing > selector/property value/etc. the difference is invisible to authors. In particular, most of the changes listed there are changed from *unspecified* CSS 2.1 behavior (because they make the stylesheet violate the grammar, and there's no rules for what to do with a stylesheet that doesn't match the grammar).
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 09:47:30 UTC