- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:46:06 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 2/14/13 5:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Our intention for the min-width behavior was admirable - in most >> situations it wouldn't affect anything > > Actually, there was a knock-on non-flexbox effect: transitioning from "no > min-width set" to "min-width set to a length" got broken because you can't > interpolate between "auto" and lengths. > > So I'd support defaulting to 0 just to avoid that web compat impact. That sounds like a bug on your side - the "auto" value should have computed to "0", which means it turns into a length in time for transitions to work. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 22:46:53 UTC