- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:45:28 -0800
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > (I've had several similar interactions, FWIW) > > So I think a large motivation for this min-size:auto feature was that it > made it the default "flex-shrink:1" behavior less painful. > > If we drop the min-size magic, should we make flex-shrink default to 0 > instead of 1, to prevent mysteriously-shrinking/overlapping flex items? Good question. I'm not sure. I'd have to think on it. I'm inclined to just keep it as it currently is, though. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 22:46:15 UTC