- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:40:01 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 2/14/13 5:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Our intention for the min-width behavior was admirable - in most > situations it wouldn't affect anything Actually, there was a knock-on non-flexbox effect: transitioning from "no min-width set" to "min-width set to a length" got broken because you can't interpolate between "auto" and lengths. So I'd support defaulting to 0 just to avoid that web compat impact. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 22:40:31 UTC