I agree. The vast majority of people are just interested in the 2d transform. Another issue with 3d is how transform-style [1] is treated. for intstance: <div id="a"> <div style="transform: rotate3d(...); transform-style: preserve-3d"> <div id="b" style="transform: rotate3d(...); transform-style: flat"> Does it make sense to transform point between a and b? 1: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transforms/#transform-style-property On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > Maybe I'm wrong but I feel like it would be best to keep 2D points and 3D > points as separate interfaces. We don't want Web authors to wonder what "z" > and "w" mean for the result of convertPointFromNode. > > > Rob > -- > Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur > Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl > bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat > lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir > — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb > tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28] >Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 17:29:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:24 UTC