Re: Transformed Pointer Coordinates? from Robert O'Callahan on 2013-02-12 (www-style@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:59:33 +1300
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbTUP1aEFxVhggAYuyRaPqr=QgbrpXzF6Q39kc-7aWUEA@mail.gmail.com>

Maybe I'm wrong but I feel like it would be best to keep 2D points and 3D
points as separate interfaces. We don't want Web authors to wonder what "z"
and "w" mean for the result of convertPointFromNode.

Rob
-- 
Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
— whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 03:00:01 UTC