RE: [css3-break] minor editorial nits

• From: Mihai Balan <mibalan@adobe.com>
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:14:40 +0000
• To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <f174810986f140fabc2e7fb2f994ec25@DM2PR02MB368.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Stearns [mailto:stearns@adobe.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 11:30 PM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: [css3-break] minor editorial nits

> 3. And on balance I believe the draft would be much better with this
> substitution:
> 
> s/fragmentainer/fragment container/g
> 

So you're basically saying that for this particular concept fragmentation == fragment? because right now a fragmentainer is a *fragmentation* container.
I'm just trying to better understand the semantic, but I'm at a loss here :)

Thanks,
m.

Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 09:15:14 UTC