- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:30:50 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/13/2013 11:27 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> >>>> 7. clip-rule is not defined. At all. There's some syntax, an explanation >>>> of how the two values differ, and an example, but no definition >>>> of what the property actually *does*. >>> >>> I put the explanation into the example [1]. Examples are normative. >> >> Examples are informative. > > Thanks for the clarification. > > The definition of clip-rule is still complete. fill-rule is normatively > referenced. It is said that UAs must follow what fill-rule does and there > is a normative paragraph that clip-rule just applies to descendants of > the <clipPath> element. I can infer that 'evenodd' and 'nonzero' on 'clip-rule' are interpreted analogously to 'fill-rule', but nothing says how it is interpreted for clipping. Nothing says that it applies to the clipping path, for example, as opposed to some other polygon. You need a real definition here. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 23:31:50 UTC