TLDR: why not “repeat(<int>, (col-start) 100px (col-end), 10px)” ==> “(col-start) 100px (col-end) 10px ... 10px (col-start) 100px (col-end)”? Reasoning: otherwise, if we want to replicate this behavior, we have to write “(col-start) 100px (col-end) repeat(<int-1>, 10px (col-start) 100px (col-end))” which is counter-intuitive (and I remember we thought it was annoying to have to define “function(<length> [, <length>]*)” instead of “function([<length>]{,}+)” and this seems like a similar issue here). Thoughts?Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 23:19:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC