On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com> wrote: > Alright I'd like to reach an consensus on how to best handle stacking > context issues since so far there doesn't seem to have one yet. > > Currently forcing a stack context for all usage of will-animate is better > for forward compatibility. For example 'will-animate: new-prop' would have > the same rendering for any browsers that supports it. It was said above > that forcing a stacking context isn't necessary to optimize the content by > layerizing under certain conditions. Not forcing a layer is handy for > authors where one wouldn't be otherwise required. > > Do any other CSS property have the property that whether they force a > stacking context depends on their value? It might be confusing to authors > that will-animate may or may not force a stacking context. > If this is confusing, then I think we should make will-animate *never* force a stacking context, since authors already have other ways to create stacking contexts when they need them.
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 00:05:30 UTC