W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2013

Re: [cssom] Drop support for alternative stylesheets?

From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:47:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CADJvFOVyuQo-H_iTGgAetyyLdOU0+vujAFYovweFK=sCqLszGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
2013/8/29 Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>:
> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/2500
>
> Presto: none
> WebKit and Blink: only the non-standard selectedStylesheetSet, but setting
> it does nothing.
> Gecko: all except the non-standard selectedStylesheetSet
> IE10: none
>
[...]
> Basically because the feature has had its chance to prove itself and it has
> failed.
>> Because it isn't popular?
> Yes.
>
>> Because it isn't implemented in browsers?
> Yes.
>
>> Because it wouldn't be useful, helpful?
> It could be useful for some users, but it seems to me like the user demand
> hasn't been strong enough.

Isn’t this a circular argument? How do you expect people to use a
feature if there is zero support? This is not being done because there
is no browser support, not that there is no browser support because
people aren’t using it. You can’t expect anything to be found in the
wild if there is no browser support.

I tried using this a long time ago and gave up because there is no
browser support. Why are we dropping more and more things from the
standards and changing things to have illogical semantics instead of
fixing the browsers?

-- 
cheers,
-ambrose <http://gniw.ca>
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 22:48:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:33 UTC